Deposit £5 Get 100 Free Spins No Wagering UK: How to Find and Claim the Offer, and Check the Winnings Are Cash (October 2026)

Quick answer: getting 100 no-wager spins for £5

• Search UK-licensed casinos first. A £5 first deposit for 100 cash spins is a format Gambling Commission licensees can run, so their promotions pages are where to look; confirm the licence in the footer. The ranking above starts at £20 or €20 with 35x to 40x wagering: more spins, but a different deal.
• Prove the winnings are cash. The payout clause should say the spin winnings are paid in cash with no wagering requirement. This one term moves the simulated median of the whole package from £3.56 at 10x to £10.79.
• Find the spin value. 100 spins at 10p are worth £9.60 on a 96% slot, but only £4.80 at 5p, and the headline count rarely says which you are getting.
• Read the cap beside the minimum withdrawal. A £100 cap cost the spins less than 35p on every model slot; a £5 cap under a £10 minimum means the spins alone can never be cashed out.
• Claim in order and play every batch. Opt in before paying if the terms ask, deposit by debit card, and use each daily batch before it expires: 20 missed spins at 10p throw away £1.92 on average.
• Know the catch. The £5 is your own money and is usually staked before any spin arrives, and 40.9% of simulated packages ended between £5 and £10: cash that is yours, but short of a £10 minimum withdrawal.

A casino licensed by the Gambling Commission can run this kind of offer, and the rules fix its shape more than the marketing does. You register, pass the age and identity checks required before any play since 7 May 2019, answer the deposit-limit prompt that every new customer has met since 31 October 2025, and pay in £5 by debit card. The usual qualifying step is then to stake that £5 on slots. After that, 100 spins arrive on one slot the casino names, at a fixed value that is almost always 10p, and with no wagering whatever they win lands in your cash balance.

The £5 is not part of the bonus. It is your own money, and the qualifying stake costs about 4% of it on average, 20p on a 96% slot; what the offer adds is the spins. That is also the difference from a no-deposit offer. A free £5 bonus with no deposit costs nothing to claim but carries 10x wagering and had a median of zero when simulated on the same model slot, while this package needs £5 of your money and almost always pays something back.

Two rules in force since 19 January 2026 apply as well. Wagering on any bonus is capped at 10 times, so a 35x clause on the spins marks a site outside UK regulation, and a promotion may not require two kinds of gambling, so the spins cannot hinge on a bet on football. Offshore sites answer the same search too, with wagering of 30x to 60x common there and none of GamStop, the 10x cap or a UK complaints route behind them.

What to compare on each £5 offer: is it really wager-free?

“No wagering” is a promise made in one clause, and the rest of the terms can quietly take it back. Before any £5 leaves your account, run each offer on your shortlist through the six lines below, in this order; an offer that fails the first two is a wagered offer whatever its advert says.

The surest test comes after the first spins. Winnings from a wager-free package belong in your cash balance, free to withdraw as soon as they pass the minimum. If they appear in a separate bonus balance, come with a target to play through, or would be forfeited by a withdrawal request, a requirement exists whatever the headline said. Stop at that point and reread the terms before you stake anything else.

What £5 and 100 no-wager spins are worth on paper

A free spin is a stake placed for you, at a value the casino fixes, on a slot it names. Its worth follows from three numbers: how many spins there are, what each one stakes, and the slot’s return to player (RTP), the share of all stakes the game pays back over a very long run. With no wagering, that is the whole calculation for the spins:

Spins’ average = 100 × £0.10 × 0.96 = £9.60

The deposit needs one more line. Staking £5 once on a 96% slot costs 4% of it on average, so £4.80 of the deposit comes back on average. Add the two halves and the package is worth £14.40 to the person who claims it, £9.40 more than the £5 paid in.

Package = £5 × 0.96 + £9.60 = £4.80 + £9.60 = £14.40

If the same spins paid their winnings as bonus funds, a second formula would apply. It gives the cash expected once the winnings B have been staked W times on a game with the same RTP: E = B × (1 − W × (1 − RTP)). It assumes the requirement is played through in full, so it is a yardstick for comparing offers rather than a forecast. The table runs both versions at the three spin values UK offers use.

Two readings matter. At every spin value the cash version is worth two thirds more than the same spins at 10x, and the gap in pounds grows with the value, from £1.92 at 5p to £7.68 at 20p. And at 5p the spins are only £5 of play, worth £4.80, the same as the deposit’s own stake: a 5p version roughly doubles what your £5 is worth on paper, while the 10p version nearly trebles it.

Why the RTP version matters less when the spins pay cash

Some slots are supplied in several RTP versions, and the one a casino runs is shown in the game’s information screen. With cash winnings, a lower version costs you only on the 100 spins themselves. With wagering it costs again on every pound of the play-through, which is why a no-wager offer is far less sensitive to the version:

From the top version in the table to the bottom, the cash spins lose about 95p; at 10x the same change wipes out the whole formula value and more. The version still deserves a look before you play, but with cash spins it decides pennies rather than the offer.

What you are likely to finish with: 100,000 simulated packages

The formula gives averages. To see how the package lands for one player, the site simulated it 100,000 times on Model A, its stand-in for a typical free-spin slot: 96% RTP, medium volatility, a win of some size on 27.9% of spins, a bonus round about once in 170 spins and a maximum of 2,500 times the stake. Model A copies no real game, because real pay tables are not published. Each simulated player deposited £5 and staked it once at 10p, 50 spins whose returns were kept as cash, and then played 100 free spins at 10p with the winnings paid as cash.

Three things follow from the ledger. The averages add up, £4.80 plus £9.60, but the medians do not: the typical package ends at £10.79, not at £3.10 plus £6.88, because a weak qualifying stake and weak spins hit the same player only about one time in four. Both halves are lopsided in the same way, with a long tail of rare large wins pulling each average above its middle. And the bad outcomes are mild: one package in ten ended below £6.69, which is still above the deposit.

Where your balance is likely to land

The next table sorts the same sessions into bands and sets them beside two alternatives from the same simulation: the £5 staked once with no bonus at all, and the same package with 10x wagering on the spin winnings, played through at 10p.

What it means for one player. With the spins paid as cash, 87 players in 100 finished between £5 and £20, and fewer than 2 in 100 finished below the deposit. Just over half (57.5%) ended with £10 or more, enough to clear a £10 minimum withdrawal from the package alone, and about one in nine (11.4%) reached £20. Without the bonus, the same £5 staked once ended above the deposit only 23.7% of the time and reached £10 in 5.9% of sessions. The spins turn a deposit that usually shrinks into one that usually grows.

Why the 10x column looks so different. With 10x wagering on the spin winnings, 84% of simulated players lost those winnings during the play-through and kept only what was left of their deposit, which is why the median, £3.56, sits close to the no-bonus median rather than above £10. The players who did finish on a good run carried large balances, so the wagered version produced more results above £50 (5.6% against 1.9%). The averages, £12.51 against £14.40, hide that swap: wagering trades the typical result for a thin chance of a larger one.

How the named slot shifts your typical result

The spins come on one slot chosen by the casino, and its volatility shapes their results even when its RTP is almost the same as another’s. The rows below come from 400,000 simulated sessions of 100 spins at 10p on each of the site’s four model slots. Model B is built to match Book of Dead’s published 96.21% RTP, high volatility class and 5,000x maximum win; Model C matches Big Bass Bonanza’s published 96.71% default, medium-high volatility and 2,100x maximum; Model D is a low-volatility 96% design with a bonus round about once in 120 spins and a 200x maximum. None of them is the real game.

Add the £4.80 left from the deposit on average to any column and you have the package’s average on that model. The low-volatility design gives the steadiest outcome, with 97.6% of sessions paying £5 or more from the spins and only one in 100 beating £23.18; the high-volatility one gives the widest spread, the lowest median and the longest tail. None of them changes the average, so no slot makes the offer worth more. What the choice changes is what the typical player sees: a median of £8.92 from the spins on the steadiest model, £5.88 on the wildest.

Which package gives most for each pound you deposit

Packages ask for different deposits, so their headline values are hard to compare directly. Dividing by the deposit puts them on one scale: how much each pound of your own money unlocks. The table does that three ways. The first column is the bonus’s value by the formula for each pound deposited. The second is the simulated average gain per pound: average cash at the end, minus the deposit, divided by the deposit. The third is the same calculation on the median, which describes the typical player rather than the average one.

The spin packages were simulated on Model A at 10p with the deposit staked once, 100,000 sessions each. The matches come from a separate run on the same model slot, 20,000 sessions each, with deposit and bonus played together at 20p until 10 times the bonus had been staked, so read across the two groups as an indication rather than a strict ranking.

Spins do not grow with the deposit. The same 100 spins are worth twice as much per pound on a £5 deposit as on a £10 one, £1.92 against £0.96, which is the main case for the smaller package. Per pound, £5 with 100 cash spins matches £10 with 200, and it unlocks more than three times the formula value of a 100% match at 10x. The £10 version with the same 100 spins is covered on the page for deposit £10, get 100 free spins.

The median splits the table in two. Every package with cash winnings leaves the typical player ahead of the deposit. Every wagered offer leaves the typical player behind it: by 23p to 29p per pound on the spin packages, and by the whole deposit on the matches, where the median result was zero because most sessions ran out before the wagering was met. The formula column, which assumes full play-through, ranks the wagered offers far more kindly than the median does.

Per pound is not the whole story. £10 with 200 cash spins gives the same £1.88 average gain per pound as this offer, but on twice the money, so its gain in pounds is twice as large (£18.79 against £9.40 on average). Use the per-pound figure to see how hard each pound works, and the comparison table further down to see what each offer adds in total.

What wagering, caps and withdrawal minimums take from the package

Cash winnings or 10x: what the payout rule is worth to you

The package simulation ran both versions of the offer on the same model slot, so the only difference between the columns is the payout rule. In the wagered version the spin winnings had to be staked 10 times at 10p, and a session that could no longer cover a stake before finishing lost them.

The formula prices 10x at £3.84, the expected cost of staking £96 on a 96% slot. The simulated average falls by less, £1.89, because sessions that run dry stop paying the house edge on the rest of the requirement; the median falls by £7.23, because most sessions do run dry. Both figures are honest. The formula is the yardstick for setting one offer against another, and the median, together with the 35.3% chance of ending above the deposit, describes what usually happens. At 35x, a multiple licensed casinos could set before 19 January 2026 and offshore sites still use, the formula value of the spins turns negative, at −£3.84, and in the site’s simulation on Model A only 6.3% of 100-spin sessions finished such a requirement at 10p stakes.

Wagering also raises a question about the deposit. Under undertakings given to the Competition and Markets Authority on 1 February 2018, Ladbrokes, William Hill and PT Entertainment committed that players can withdraw their own money while playing as part of a bonus promotion. With cash spins the question never arises, because nothing in the account is locked.

How much a maximum-win cap takes from the spins

A cap limits what the spins can pay, and what it costs depends on the slot’s volatility, because a cap trims only results above it. The table applies each cap to the same 400,000 sessions of 100 spins at 10p on each model slot; the figures are the average the spins keep.

A £100 cap costs every model less than 35p. At £20 the models part company: the low-volatility design keeps 99% of its value, Models A and C about 85% and the high-volatility Model B 77%, because more of its return sits in rare large wins. A £5 cap roughly halves every column. With the deposit’s £4.80 added back, a £20 cap on Model A leaves the whole package at about £12.90 on average instead of £14.40. A cap below the minimum withdrawal is the one to refuse outright: with a £5 cap and a £10 minimum, the spins alone can never produce a withdrawable balance.

Getting the cash out: minimum withdrawal, expiry and time

Because the winnings are cash, the only hurdle between the package and your bank account is the minimum withdrawal. With a £10 minimum, 57.5% of the packages simulated on Model A could have been withdrawn as they stood; with a £20 minimum, 11.4%; with a £5 minimum, 98.4%. Free spins usually expire between 24 hours and 7 days after crediting, and when 100 spins arrive in daily batches each batch can carry its own deadline, so a missed day is lost rather than postponed: 20 spins at 10p are worth £1.92 on average. Time itself is no obstacle. The qualifying stake and the spins add up to 150 spins, at least 6 minutes 15 seconds at the 2.5-second legal minimum and about 15 minutes at an assumed 600 spins an hour, a little more than the 124 spins of the average online slots session in January to March 2026, according to the Gambling Commission.

Value the offer in front of you with the calculator

The calculator is preset for this offer’s spins: 100 at 10p, no wagering, a 96% slot and no maximum win. Replace each figure with the one in the offer in front of you, taking the RTP from the slot’s information screen and entering 0 for wagering when the winnings are paid as cash. It returns the spins’ value if any wagering is played through in full, the yardstick used on this page, and the time a requirement would take at 10p and at £1 a spin.

It values the spins only. For the whole package, add what is left of your deposit after the qualifying stake, 96% of it on average on a 96% slot. And remember that the simulation, not the calculator, shows how widely results scatter: enter a wagering figure of 10 and the value drops from £9.60 to £5.76, while the simulated median of the package on Model A falls much further, from £10.79 to £3.56.

Where to look among UK brands for a deposit-and-spins welcome

A live £5, 100-spin, no-wager offer is found on a brand’s own promotions page on the day you register. Welcome deals change often, so that page is the only reliable source, and no brand below is said to be running one now. What is known about each group is how it builds welcomes, which shows where a deposit-and-spins package fits and what to check when one appears. Every brand below holds a Gambling Commission licence, so the 10x cap, verification before play, GamStop and the ban on credit cards apply to all of them, and crypto is not among their payment options.

Brands where no wagering is the house rule

PlayOJO, run by SkillOnNet, and MrQ, run by Lindar Media, were built on a promise of no wagering on any bonus, so at those two brands “no wagering” is a property of the site rather than of a single promotion. Their spin counts tend to be smaller than the largest headline numbers elsewhere, and the package simulation on Model A shows why a smaller cash count can still be the stronger deal: on a £5 deposit, 100 spins paid as cash had a median of £10.79, while 200 spins with 10x wagering had a median of £3.79, below the deposit.

Deposit-led brands, where spins follow a payment

Flutter’s sportsbook-led brands, Paddy Power, Betfair and Sky Bet, tie their casino welcomes to a first deposit or stake as a rule. bet365, privately owned and based in Stoke-on-Trent, puts sport first and casino second, and its casino welcomes are deposit-based as a rule; so are those of Betway, which runs sportsbook and casino under one name. At brands built like this, spins are what a payment unlocks, and the arithmetic on this page applies directly: the deposit stays your money and the spins are the bonus. Since 19 January 2026 none of them may make casino spins depend on a sports bet. Within Flutter, Sky Vegas is the casino-first brand and the one most associated with spins that need no deposit at all.

Bally’s (Gamesys) runs Virgin Games, Jackpotjoy, Monopoly Casino, Rainbow Riches Casino and Double Bubble Bingo on one platform, and its welcomes typically follow a “deposit £10, play with more” pattern, alongside frequent small promotions for existing players. A £5 entry point would sit below that pattern, so check the qualifying deposit in the terms rather than assuming it from a headline.

Prize wheels: read the headline as the best case

Jumpman Gaming’s Amazon Slots, Dream Jackpot and Prime Casino turn the first-deposit welcome into a spin of a prize wheel, so the figure in the advert is the top segment, not the usual one. If 100 spins appears on such a wheel, it is the best case, and the offer is worth what most players land on. 888 Casino, now part of evoke (formerly 888) alongside William Hill, 777 Casino and 888sport, has been online since 1997 and spent a decade advertising no-deposit spins. Kindred, now under FDJ United, runs 32Red as a casino-first brand and Unibet as a sportsbook-first one with a casino attached.

One welcome per group: choose before you register

Entain’s Ladbrokes, Coral, Gala Casino, Gala Bingo, Foxy Bingo and PartyCasino share one account structure, and a single welcome per group is the norm. The LeoVegas group, owned by MGM Resorts and designed for mobile play, runs LeoVegas, BetMGM and Bet UK; BetMGM’s British site has run on the LeoVegas licence and platform since it launched in 2023. Claiming a spins welcome at one brand in a group can close the welcome at its sisters, so compare within a group before registering anywhere in it.

What enforcement records tell you about a brand

Fines and settlements are published against licence holders, not brands. The largest for these groups run from William Hill’s £19.2m (2023) and Entain’s £17m (2022) through Betway’s £11.6m (2020), 888’s £9.4m (2022), Kindred’s £7.1m (2023) and Betfred’s £3.25m (2023) down to bet365’s £582,120 (2024). They say nothing about a spins offer. They do show a regulator that can investigate and penalise, which no offshore site answers to. Grosvenor Casinos, Genting Casino and Admiral Casino, like Betfred, also trade on British high streets, and for names such as Casumo, Duelz, Mr Vegas or Magic Red the check is the licence holder and Commission account number in the footer, confirmed on the public register.

Offshore spin packages, the ranking’s included: what changes

The ranking at the top of this page is made up of offshore casinos, licensed in Anjouan, Curaçao and Costa Rica, and none of them is connected to GamStop. Their packages are bigger than £5 and 100 spins and none is wager-free: each needs at least £20 or €20, releases 150 to 500 spins in stages as further deposits are made and sets wagering at 35x to 40x, all shown on the cards. Put through this page’s formula, 100 spins at 10p are worth −£3.84 at 35x and −£5.76 at 40x (£9.60 × (1 − 40 × 0.04)), so on those packages it is the play-through, not the spin count, that decides what you keep.

Search for this offer and other results lead to casinos that are not licensed in Great Britain either. Their headlines can look bigger, but wagering of 30x to 60x is common offshore, several of the names below take cryptocurrency, and a “no wagering” line in an advert has no regulator behind it.

The names in that market show who a player would be dealing with. Santeda International B.V., a Curaçao-licensed company, runs Mystake, Goldenbet, Rolletto, Donbet and Velobet; none of the five is on the UK register or connected to GamStop, all accept cryptocurrency, their wagering is uncapped, and the Commission cannot act on a complaint about them. Kinghills and NineWin belong to a network of sister sites run by Curaçao-registered companies; they launched recently, have no public track record and reach British players through “not on GamStop” pages. Rainbet holds an Anjouan licence through RBGAMING N.V. and is built around deposits in Bitcoin and other coins. Roobet and Gamdom grew out of the gaming-skins market into Curaçao-licensed crypto casinos. None of them is licensed in Great Britain, and nothing here says any of them runs a particular offer.

What a UK player gives up is concrete: GamStop, the deposit-limit prompt, the 10x cap, the 2.5-second spin minimum and the autoplay ban, the eight-week complaints deadline and access to ADR, and, with a crypto deposit, any regulator, ombudsman or bank protection behind the payment. The simulation is just as blunt about a typical offshore requirement: on Model A only 6.3% of 100-spin sessions finished a 35x play-through at 10p stakes, against a licensed cash-spins package that left 98.4% of players above their deposit. Offering gambling in Great Britain without a licence is an offence by the operator, not the player, but it is the player who carries the risk. The homepage guide to fake and offshore bonus offers shows the patterns to recognise.

Reading the terms: nine clauses and what each one costs you

The clauses below were written for this page as an illustration and are not taken from any casino’s terms. Each is of a type that deposit-and-spins offers use, and the right-hand column shows what it does to the figures above.

Three clauses decide almost everything: the payout clause (cash or bonus funds), the batch and expiry clause, and the minimum withdrawal. Read those first, then read the spin value next to the cap, because a cap that looks generous on 10p spins can bite on 20p ones.

How to claim deposit £5, get 100 free spins, step by step

The order of events is set by regulation, not by the casino, and it is the same whichever brand runs the offer.

1. Check the licence. The site’s footer should name the licence holder and show its Gambling Commission account number. Confirm both on the public register before you sign up.
2. Read the offer terms first. Note the spin value, the named slot, whether the £5 must be staked, the batch schedule and expiry, any cap and the minimum withdrawal, and confirm that the winnings are paid as cash.
3. Register and pass verification. Age and identity checks come before any play. Most run automatically; some ask for a passport or driving licence.
4. Set a deposit limit at the prompt. It appears before your first deposit, and a figure chosen then is the one most likely to hold later.
5. Opt in if required, then deposit £5 by debit card. When the terms ask for the opt-in first, the order matters.
6. Make the qualifying stake. If the £5 must be staked, any eligible slot will do; choose one whose information screen shows a high RTP, because this part of the ledger is your own money.
7. Play the spins before they expire, and watch where the winnings land. 100 spins take at least 4 minutes 10 seconds at the 2.5-second minimum. With daily batches, set a reminder for each day. Winnings that appear in a bonus balance rather than your cash balance mean a requirement after all.
8. Withdraw once the balance clears the minimum. Since 31 October 2021 a licensed casino cannot offer to reverse a withdrawal once requested. After approval, a Faster Payments transfer is usually available almost immediately, though it can take up to two hours.

Red flags that a no-wagering headline hides a requirement

• “No wagering” in the advert, “bonus balance” in the terms. Spin winnings credited as bonus funds mean a requirement somewhere, and at 10x the package median simulated on Model A falls from £10.79 to £3.56.
• Any multiple above 10x. It exceeds the UK ceiling in force since 19 January 2026, so the offer comes from an unlicensed site or breaks a licence.
• A cap at or below the minimum withdrawal. A £10 cap with a £10 minimum means the spins can never pay out more than £10, and a £5 cap with the same minimum means they can never be withdrawn on their own.
• A sports bet needed to unlock the spins. Promotions that require two kinds of gambling have been banned since 19 January 2026.
• Cryptocurrency or a credit card in the cashier. A UK-licensed casino cannot take a credit card, and crypto in the cashier strongly suggests an operator with no UK licence.
• “No ID needed”. Verification before play is a licence condition, whatever the size of the deposit.
• A spin value you cannot find. At 5p the package is worth £9.60 by the formula, not £14.40, and the headline alone does not say which.
• “Not on GamStop” in the marketing. It describes a site that sits outside every UK protection, and it is aimed at people who chose to exclude themselves.

Is it good value? £5 and 100 cash spins against nearby offers

The table sets this package beside the offers around it, all with 10p spins on Model A. Formula values for the deposit offers include what the deposit is worth after its qualifying stake, and the simulated figures are cash at the end of each session.

Against its closest relative, deposit £5, get 200 free spins, everything turns on the payout rule. With 10x wagering the 200-spin version has the higher formula value and average, but its median, £3.79, sits below the deposit and only 39.2% of simulated players ended above £5; with cash winnings it beats this offer on every measure. Doubling the deposit to £10 adds the deposit’s own value but no extra spins, so £10 with 100 cash spins ends higher in pounds and lower per pound deposited, while the £10 package with 200 no-wager spins doubles both the deposit and the spins.

At the no-deposit end, 50 free spins with no wager cost nothing and averaged £4.78, while the free £5 at 10x averaged £4.12 with a median of zero. Paying £5 in buys a much larger typical result than either, at the price of putting your own money in. The guide to the £5 deposit casino shows what the same £5 does with no bonus at all, across slots, bingo and roulette.

Playing safely with a deposit-and-spins offer

This offer ends with cash in the account, and the decision about that cash is the moment to plan for. Settle it before the first spin: withdraw once the balance clears the minimum, or leave it there, but do not deposit again to lift a £7 balance to £10, because that turns a bonus into a new paid session.

Use the tools as they come up. The deposit-limit prompt before the first deposit is the natural place to cap the total, not just the first £5. Daily batches give a reason to log in every day; if that pull starts to feel like a habit, a time-out pauses the account, and GamStop, compulsory for licensed online operators since 31 March 2020, blocks every one of them with a single registration. The legal slot stake limits, £5 a spin from age 25 and £2 a spin from 18 to 24, apply to the qualifying stake too, and they cap each spin, not what a session can cost.

If the spins have become a reason to keep depositing, or you find yourself playing to win back what the qualifying stake lost, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133.

How we worked out the numbers

Formula values use spins × spin value × RTP for the spins, deposit × RTP for what a deposit staked once returns, and E = B × (1 − W × (1 − RTP)) for wagered winnings, at 96% RTP unless a row says otherwise, rounded to the penny. Per-pound figures divide those values, or the simulated average or median minus the deposit, by the deposit.

The ledger comes from the site’s package simulation: 100,000 sessions per version on Model A (96% RTP, medium volatility, a 27.9% hit rate, a bonus round about once in 170 spins, a 2,500x maximum). Each session staked the £5 deposit once at 10p, kept what was left as cash, then played 100 spins at 10p with the winnings paid as cash or, for the 10x rows, staked at 10p until the requirement was met or the balance could not cover a stake. The four-model figures and the caps use 400,000 sessions of 100 spins per model, with each cap applied to the same sessions; Models B and C are built to match the published RTP, volatility class and maximum win of Book of Dead and Big Bass Bonanza, and are not those games. The match rows come from 20,000 sessions each, with deposit and bonus played together at 20p.

The limits: model slots illustrate how volatility behaves and do not reproduce any real game, whose pay tables are not public. The package assumes the deposit is staked exactly once before the spins, while real qualifying rules vary; batch schedules and caps on the whole package were not simulated; times assume the 2.5-second legal minimum, or an assumed 600 spins an hour where stated. How the offers listed near the top of the page are chosen is explained under how we evaluate and rank offers.

Frequently asked questions